Daily Sustainability News Roundup: March 10, 2010

Fleishman-Hillard’s Sustainability blog publishes a daily roundup of compelling stories from traditional media and blogs that straddle the nexus of sustainability, energy policy, and corporate social responsibility. Inclusion of stories does not translate into endorsement of any particular opinion or technology over another.

Drought Has Venezuela Looking at Alternatives to Hydropower (via New York Times’ Green Inc.)

A severe and prolonged drought in Venezuela has the country considering ways to diversify its energy portfolio through wind and nuclear power. Hydropower currently produces up to two-thirds of the total national energy total.

Kerry Says ‘Great Deal’ of Consensus Reached on Climate Policy (via Bloomberg)

Senator John Kerry (D-MA) says a bipartisan group of lawmakers reached consensus at a White House meeting on energy policy, and expects to introduce climate legislation into the U.S. Senate soon.

Xtreme Power: A Super-Battery For Hawaiian Wind Farms (via Earth2Tech)

A clean tech startup has announced a new battery energy storage project to back up a 30-megawatt wind farm on the Hawaiian island of Oahu.

IMF Proposes Global Fund to Ease Climate Adaption (via The Atlantic)

The International Monetary Fund is proposing a global climate change adaption fund as insurance for countries facing the worst consequences of global warming’s effects.

EPA Piecing Together Regulatory Framework for Greenhouse Gas Rules (via New York Times)

The U.S. EPA has submitted the first portion of its rules to regulate greenhouse gas emissions to the White House, signaling that the Obama administration is on schedule to regulate emissions through regulation in the absence of federal legislation.

China, India give nod to Copenhagen climate change accord (via Washington Post and Associated Press)

China and India have given qualified approval to the Copenhagen climate accord calling for voluntary limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

Electrified roads could power vehicles, say researchers (via BusinessGreen)

South Korean researchers have developed a way to charge electric vehicles while they are traveling by embedding magnetic compounds in the road.

Businesses offer best path to money in smart grid (via CNET’s Green Tech)

Commercial and industrial business power customers who can save large amounts of money may be the best prospects for smart grid and smart metering funding, instead of consumers who may be unwilling to change their energy consumption.

On rooftops worldwide, a solar water heating revolution (via Grist)

Rooftop solar thermal water heaters are spreading fast across the globe as a way to convert sunlight into heat to warm water and homes.

EPA: U.S. saw record decline in greenhouse gas emissions in 2008 (via Los Angeles Times’ Greenspace)

High gasoline prices, a slow economy, and a cool summer caused U.S. greenhouse gas emissions to decrease nearly 3 percent in 2008 from 2007 levels, according to the U.S. EPA.

Green stimulus spending shifts forward. Probably. (via Financial Times’ Energy Source)

Financial analysts HSBC has revised downward its estimate of the money spent in 2009 by governments on green stimulus packages from $94 billion to $82 billion, citing difficulty in actually spending the money.

Australia’s Renewable Energy Future Report Released (via The Energy Collective)

The Australian Academy of Science has released an outlook report on the country’s renewable energy future, which urges adaption of low-carbon generation technology.

Lesson’s From Spain’s Solar Bubble (via The New Republic’s The Vine)

The boom, bust, and recovery of Spain’s solar industry may hold lessons for America’s nascent solar industry.

Scientists Develop New Plastics That Can Be Recycled Continuously (via Yale Environment’s e360 digest)

Researchers at IBM and Stanford University have discovered a cheap organic catalyst that can build up and break down plastics over and over again. By comparison, the metal catalysts currently used contaminate and degrade polymers over time, eventually making them unrecyclable.

U.S. Sitting on Mother Lode of Rare Tech-Crucial Minerals (via TechNews Daily)

The U.S. holds largely untapped reserves of rare earth minerals found in green technologies, according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Until now, China has supplied most of these materials, and concern about material availability threatened to limit new technological innovations.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

The United States: Post-Copenhagen IT

COP15 has come and gone… leaving behind a bad taste for some and a grain of hope for the others.  But no matter which of those two groups you belong to, outside of your window the movement toward more sustainable world continues.

The Information Technology is only one area of industry that is in full focus right now in the US. Just recently, the government and private sectors announced a $115 million dollars investment into 14 IT projects that would work on improvement of energy efficiency in the following areas:

  • IT equipment
  • Software
  • Power supply chain and cooling

IT equipment and software projects will focus on servers and networking devices and how they can be optimized in order to be more energy efficient. Power supply chain projects will look at how to “minimize power loss and heat generation that occurs in server-based IT systems.” The cooling projects will focus on improvement of cooling equipment in order to use less energy.

From $115 million claimed, $47 million is coming from the U.S. Department of Energy. The following is a breakdown of how the funds will be distributed among IT companies based on their areas of specialty:

Funding for IT equipment and software projects will go to:

Funding for power supply chain projects will go to:

Funding for cooling projects will go to:

So if you, like so many, feel that the Copenhagen summit took away our last hope for change – think again. The only reason we didn’t reach the new treaty is because the countries couldn’t agree on the financial and legislative commitment toward each other at this time. But, that doesn’t mean that the commitments don’t exist on the national level, as we can see with the US – they just need to be re-thought and re-engineered in order to fit into the international level, as well. Once countries are clear on what they can do inside their own borders, they will become clearer on what they can offer between international borders, as well.

So, let’s just keep going.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

January 14th, 2010 by Korina Bogdanovic | 1 Comment

Tags: · · · ·

Insights from Copenhagen: The “Copenhagen Accord”

vox_logo_whiteIt appears that world leaders have reached an agreement—well into the night in Copenhagen.  Insiders are saying it provides a means to monitor and verify emissions cuts by developing countries but has less ambitious climate targets than the United States and European governments had initially sought.

The deal was brokered by a handful of countries—U.S., China, India, and South Africa.  We’ll take the weekend and analyze information coming out of Copenhagen and provide a summary of the agreement on Monday.  Watch President Obama’s press conference here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

December 18th, 2009 by Tony Calandro | Comment on this.

Tags: ·

Time for Leadership on Climate Aid

BRUSSELS, Belgium—Who will lead on climate aid for developing countries? Ahead of a meeting with EU environment ministers in Brussels on the 23rd of November, the UN’s top negotiator Yvo De Boer repeated the essentials for a successful deal on climate change: new legally binding targets to limit greenhouse gas emissions and finding an agreement on how to finance the global effort to reduce emissions.

The latter issue, financing, is clearly one of the most divisive on the agenda of the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP15). Earlier this month, representatives of countries in the developing world threatened to walk out of the Copenhagen climate change summit if developed countries do not make greater progress in reducing emissions and helping the developing world in its transition to a low-carbon economy.

Experts from the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative estimate that investments of around $500 billion a year will be necessary to help the developing world tackle the causes of climate change while stimulating low carbon growth.

So far the enthusiasm for ‘paying the bill’ to help out the developing world in mitigating climate change has been limited.

While the US recently committed to figures for its emissions reductions, the EU has been urged to be clearer on targets and climate aid to developing countries.

After the meeting with EU environment ministers on the 23rd of November, UN negotiator De Boer commented that the EU should show “what it has in its hand and put that final hand on the table”, for “[l]eadership is about having the courage to storm the final bridge” and to make things happen.

For more information, read: Briefing on Financing Climate Change.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

December 2nd, 2009 by Maite Morren | Comment on this.

Tags: · ·

Our Planet is in Our Hands

ST.LOUIS—Only several weeks from the beginning of COP15 meeting (December 7-18), it is becoming evident that the new treaty will most likely not happen.  President Obama along with the leaders of world’s top economic countries issued a statement on Sunday that no major breakthroughs should be expected in December.  The statement followed Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen’s acknowledgement at the APEC summit in Singapore (November 8-15) that the conference “is no longer likely to yield a major accord to battle global warming.”

As a result, and following the US and Chinese lead, countries are now endorsing a new two-step process that would help move things forward:

1.  All 191 countries should sign an agreement on how to finance the coordinated efforts to battle climate change.

2.  All countries should sign a binding deal on cutting carbon emissions.

According to Mike Froman, a White House deputy national security adviser, the two-step process presents a more realistic objective at this time.

So, we might not see a major deal come out of December, but what we are already seeing is what gears the change and that is involvement. Involvement around the world, from industrialized to developing nations; thinking, talking, negotiating.  Getting engaged.  And we might not agree on everything in terms of finances or legislation, but we all do agree on one thing: we live in one home, our planet, and that home needs our help.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

December 1st, 2009 by Korina Bogdanovic | Comment on this.

Tags: · · ·

Financing Conservation: Thomas Friedman Looks Closer at Brazil’s Tapajos National Forest

(Credit: Brazilian Ministry of Environment)

(Credit: Brazilian Ministry of Environment)

One of the most contentious issues on the table at COP15 will be financing climate change.

Experts from the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Finance Initiative estimate that investments of around $500 billion a year will be needed to help the countries in the developing world tackle the causes of climate change while stimulating low carbon growth.

Getting to the very heart of this issue, New York Times columnist and green advocate Thomas Friedman proposes that: “To save an ecosystem of nature, you need an ecosystem of markets and governance.”

In his column filed on November 11 from the Tapajós National Forest in Brazil, Friedman argues that fighting deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon – and tropical forests in Indonesia and the Congo – is an essential part of a global plan to reduce carbon emissions.

“…We could eliminate 17 percent of all global emissions if we could halt the cutting and burning of tropical forests. But to do that requires putting in place a whole new system of economic development — one that makes it more profitable for the poorer, forest-rich nations to preserve and manage their trees rather than to chop them down to make furniture or plant soybeans.”

This is interesting because it is written on the sidelines of one of the most successful sustainable forest management programs that the world has seen to date.

Through our work with the Brazilian government, Fleishman-Hillard has had the unique opportunity to become familiar with the domestic and global climate change initiatives being led by Brazil as they unfold. The Ambé Project is one that really stands out.

The Ambé Project in Brazil’s Tapajós National Forest is an industrial-scale community initiative for sustainable, low-impact forest management. Launched in 2005 with support from the federal government, the Brazilian Environment Institute, and international financing, it has helped families in 29 forest communities embrace sustainable and marketable timber and non-timber forest production techniques in order to quell deforestation and help improve the economic wellbeing of the forest residents. In 2009, the Ambé project grossed over US $ 2 million by auctioning their timber to local companies.

As the column states, Brazil already has national programs in place that set aside 43 percent of the Amazon rainforest for conservation and for indigenous peoples – but the big question is what will happen to the other 38 percent.

The more we get the Brazilian system to work, the more of that 38 percent will be preserved and the less carbon reductions the whole world would have to make. But it takes money… money to expand into more markets, money to maintain police monitoring and enforcement and money to improve the productivity of farming on already degraded lands so people won’t eat up more rainforest.

I think it’s important to see the proposed financing as global support for an issue of global concern, not a handout. Brazil offers a great opportunity to move the dial on climate change: there is already strong political will to fight deforestation, a diversified renewable energy market, wide social awareness and acceptance of green efforts, and successful models in place that have already made a tangible difference in the fight against deforestation.

In fact, data released at the end of last week by Brazil’s National Institute for Space Research (INPE) indicates that Amazon deforestation had dropped 45% year-on-year by August 2009 to just 7,008 square kilometers (2,706 square miles) – the lowest figure since Brazil began monitoring deforestation in 1988.

The challenge now is for the world to unite on a global agreement to ensure that this progress continues.

As Friedman writes: “Your grandchildren will thank you.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

What FH Blogged This Week

Another busy week has passed us by. FHers in the United States are preparing for next week’s Thanksgiving festivities, while also gearing up with the world for the home stretch to COP15. Doesn’t look like the hard work will be slowing down soon. Speaking of hard work, here’s what our sister blogs were discussing this week…

FH Innovation asks: “Is recovery right around the corner?” The signals seem to be mixed. What are you seeing where you work? They also encouraged organizations not to fear a loss of control and embrace digital.

Meanwhile, FH Out Front explored the exciting phenomena of “flash mobs” to raise awareness of social issues. They also took a look at the role schools can play in elevating discussion and education of LGBT issues.

Have a great weekend. See you on Twitter!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

November 20th, 2009 by Jamie Carracher | Comment on this.

Tags: · · ·

COP15 … and a Half?

COP155There is significant hope that the COP15 Conference in Copenhagen this December will put an end to the recent two-year international negotiation process over the commitment of industrialized and developing nations to lower carbon emissions. The goal of COP15 is to establish a replacement for the Kyoto Protocol, an international agreement linked to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.

Officials now say that such an agreement is unlikely to be nailed down at the December 2009 Conference. However, the world may not have to wait a full 12 months in order for conversations and decisions to resume. Some officials are talking about picking discussions back up as early as the spring of 2010 if an agreement can’t be reached in a few short weeks. That is because climate change is urgent and also because the UN is looking to the U.S. Congress pass national legislation – and soon.

According to the News Section of the United Nations Climate Change Web site, “Short of a clear picture on which commitments the world’s second largest emitter is likely to take, a number of other key players will most likely hide their cards. This situation may have changed by spring 2010, but then one can’t be certain right now, which is why the UN has not decided yet if it will recommend a spring conference.”

My hope is that COP15 (and a half) – should it happen – be a “more half full” event rather than “half empty.” In other words, that it leads as fast as possible to an effective set of decisions that can be implemented by all participating nations.

When it comes to COP15, would you say that you too are optimistic? Is your view of the conference half full or half empty? Please post your comments here.

PS: If you are interested in learning more about COP15, you can visit the COP15 United Nations Climate Change Conference Web site. This site provides up-to-date news, information and views on all matters pertaining to this important global event.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

November 18th, 2009 by Aili Jokela | Comment on this.

Tags: · · · ·

New Clarity For Climate Change in Copenhagen

As the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen approaches, the pressure to organize legislation is felt in most all of the world’s countries. This pressure comes from a need to end an ongoing two-year negotiation process over the commitment of industrial and developing nations to lowering carbon emissions. The main goal – establishment of a replacement for Kyoto Treaty.

However, only a few weeks from the beginning of conference, December 7th2009, the countries are still struggling with little to no success to come up with a permanent legislation that would be represented at the conference. “It is physically impossible to finalize all the details of a treaty in Copenhagen” said the secretary-general of the UN climate change secretariat Yvo de Boer in the article UN climate chief: No final, global warming treaty in 2009, “but the principles of a deal must be settled.”

De Boer states that, given the current lack of political and financial agreement in countries, the new goal of the conference is to reach an agreement on, what he calls, the Four Political Essentials:

1. How much are the industrialized countries willing to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases?

2. How much are major developing countries such as China and India willing to do to limit the growth of their emissions?

3. How is the help needed by developing countries to engage in reducing their emissions and adapting to the impacts of climate change going to be financed?

4. How is that money going to be managed?

These four essentials are meant to bring, what the article calls, ‘clarity’ on the climate issues, especially to the financially struggling business world.

“If Copenhagen can deliver on those four points,” says Yvo de Boer in the above mentioned article, “I’d be happy”.

So perhaps this December will not bring us much anticipated new treaty, but clarity might be what is most needed at this time… Clarity to truly understand the key role that we, as individuals or nations, play in the future of our planet.

And it only gets better from there.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

November 11th, 2009 by Korina Bogdanovic | Comment on this.

Tags: · · ·

FH Green Finds: COP15 is Not Just Negotiations

Copenhagen, Denmark (Credit: Flickr user jimg944)

Copenhagen, Denmark (Credit: Flickr user jimg944)

This time we are not talking about emission targets or other key topics on the table of the negotiators… From 7 to 18 December, thousands of people around the world will be looking at the Copenhagen summit waiting to hear what comes next after the Kyoto Protocol. But people that will actually go to Copenhagen will have the opportunity not only to follow very closely days of intense political negotiations, but also to attend a series of side events organised by business associations, countries, NGOs, and academia. These events will deal with various aspects of climate change and will present different answers to the battle against it. They will certainly be a great occasion to exchange views with relevant stakeholders and to possibly meet some delegates of the U.N Conference and key opinion leaders in the field of sustainability.

For the lucky ones that will manage to be there (note that it’s impossible now to get a room in a hotel in the city), below there is a list of possible suggestions.

Klimaforum09, Peoples Climate Summit
Organized by Klimaforum09, a network of Danish and environmental movements and civil society groups
7-18 December, DGI-byen

The idea behind Klimaforum09 is to create an open space, where people, movements and organisations can gather and develop constructive solutions to the climate crisis.

Copenhagen Business Day
Organized by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC)

11 December, Confederation of Danish Industry Headquarter
The Copenhagen Business Day will be a day for business leaders to explore, share and project their vision and commitment to implement climate solutions now and for the next four decades.

Bright Green
Organized by the Confederation of Danish Industry
12-13 December, FORUM

Bright Green will give participants the opportunity to showcase with a stand the business response to the climate challenge, in particular to present the solutions and technologies developed by different sectors to tackle climate change.

In the Eye of Climate Change
Organized by the Greenlandic Authority
12-20 December, North Atlantic House

Greenland businesses, organisations and authorities join forces to paint a portrait of modern Greenland: its new forms of energy, Arctic technology, research and the future prospects for tourism, oil extraction and agriculture.

Earth Journalism Awards
Organized by the Earth Journalism Network (EJN)
14 December, Danish Radio Hall

In the past months professional journalists and citizen journalists from around the world were invited to submit their climate change reports in any media. The Earth Journalism Awards will honor the world’s best climate change report and creative work in the lead up to the United Nations Climate Change Conference.

Urban Climate Solutions Tour
Organized by Ramboll
14 December, Ørestad Station

This three hour Urban Climate Solutions Tour on Ørestad, Copenhagen, will give participants the opportunity to discover the Danish unique energy model and some of the innovative climate adaptation initiatives.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Netvibes
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter

Search

About this Blog

This blog is written by employees of Fleishman-Hillard International Communications. The views expressed here represent the individual opinions of members of Fleishman-Hillard Sustainability, and do not necessarily represent the views of the company or its clients.

Archives